Living Cost Laboratory
The numbers, and the life behind them.
Insights · Match

Get a shortlist built around you

A few multiple-choice questions. No personal details required — just your priorities, so the tool can weigh what matters to you.

Our algorithm weighs multiple dimensions — affordability, investment climate, international connectivity, food culture, cultural depth, environment, lifestyle quality, and academic resources — against our full city dataset. The result: a personalized shortlist that changes based on what you value.

Not a ranking. A couple planning retirement sees different results than a founder chasing investment opportunities — because cities and people are different.

How it works

We weigh what you care about, not what's popular.

Most city guides rank places from "best" to "worst." This tool does the opposite: it starts with you. Your answers adjust the weight of multiple research-backed dimensions, which are then scored against our full city dataset.

The same city can be a top match for a digital nomad and invisible for a retiree, because we score across multiple dimensions rather than forcing each city into a single category.

1. Who are you moving with?

2. How important is housing affordability?

3. What best describes your reason for considering China?

4. How often do you expect to travel internationally?

5. What kind of environment do you need?

Each option bundles climate, air quality, and lifestyle feel — pick the combination that sounds closest to your ideal daily experience.

6. Which aspects of city life matter most?

Select up to four.

7. Which statement feels closest to you?

Your matches

Your top matches

How your answers shaped these results

Complete the questionnaire above to see a breakdown of how your priorities map to each dimension.

How we matched these cities

Based on the priorities you selected.

Before you start

Where people like you usually end up

The quiz weighs eight dimensions at once, which is the point of it. If you would rather see the shape of the answer first, these are the five profiles that come up most often and the cities the tool tends to surface for each. Treat them as starting points rather than verdicts, and run the quiz for your own combination.

Remote worker on a foreign income

Your income isn't tied to the local job market, so you collect the low rent without taking on the low wage. These three hold the healthiest rent-to-local-wage ratios in the whole project, Kunming at 28%, Xi'an at 29%, Chengdu at 36%, which means the affordability isn't borrowed from anyone's future.

Usually surfaces: Chengdu, Kunming, Xi'an

Retiree or long-stay couple

Climate and pace tend to outweigh career considerations, and all three have an established foreign community. Kunming holds the lowest rent-to-wage ratio in the series, while Dalian and Qingdao are both meaningfully cheaper than their reputations suggest, one shaped by Japanese and Korean industry, the other by a German-built core and a beer that got famous first.

Usually surfaces: Kunming, Qingdao, Dalian

Founder or someone chasing opportunity

Opportunity and affordability pull in opposite directions, and this is the profile where the tool's weighting shows most. Shenzhen has the lowest barriers to entry and the harshest exit. Hangzhou concentrates tech and capital. Chengdu is the compromise that still clears the cost bar.

Usually surfaces: Shenzhen, Hangzhou, Chengdu

Ceramics or craft practitioner

The one city in this project where cheapness is deliberate policy rather than a side effect: subsidized workshop streets, starter rents around ¥300 a month, and interest-free loans aimed at young makers. If you work in clay, this is the only entry on this list that is really a subsidy and you should take it. If you don't, the discount isn't worth what the city hasn't built yet.

Usually surfaces: Jingdezhen

Family with school-age children

School supply concentrates in the first tier, which is exactly where the cost arithmetic stops working: Shanghai's rent-to-income is the worst in the project, and Beijing doesn't price you out so much as ration you out, through hukou and school enrollment. Suzhou is the practical third option, a 33% ratio roughly thirty minutes from Shanghai by rail.

Usually surfaces: Shanghai, Suzhou, Beijing

Questions people actually ask

Quick answers

Is this tool ranking Chinese cities from best to worst?

No. Different priorities produce different recommendations. The same city can be a strong match for one set of answers and not appear for another. There is no single "best" city in the results.

How does the matching algorithm work?

Your answers adjust the weight of multiple factors, investment environment, international connectivity, affordability, food culture, cultural depth, climate fit, lifestyle quality, and academic resources, which are then scored against a fixed city dataset. The cities with the highest weighted scores are shown as your strongest matches.

Why are only these cities included in the results?

The current dataset covers a curated range of cities that span the range of Chinese urban experiences while keeping the tool focused. We expand the pool as we publish more city guides.

Can a city appear in more than one type of match?

Yes. A city like Chengdu or Hangzhou can be a strong match for very different combinations of priorities, because each city scores across multiple dimensions rather than fitting a single category.

Should I use this instead of the detailed city guides?

They answer different questions. This tool helps narrow a shortlist based on what you value; the individual city guides and the cost calculator run the actual math on rent, salary, and day-to-day living once you have specific cities in mind.

Before you go

Get the next city, when it's ready

One short email when a new guide goes live — the real numbers, and the life behind them. Written by someone who lives in China and does the math in yuan.

No spam. One click to unsubscribe.